Both Sides of the Table

NOVEMBER 3, 2009

I remember going to an Under the Radar conference in 2006 in the heat of the Web 2.0 There were tons of young entrepreneurs showing their latest Web 2.0 Unfortunately this was reinforced by the many conferences that rushed to espouse the benefits of Web 2.0 portfolios.

Web 2.0 334

Web 2.0 Venture Capital Web Technical Review 334

Both Sides of the Table

APRIL 13, 2011

This time frame – 2005/2006 – web 2.0 2. .“… “Then we engage with the product and the entrepreneur and because we know these areas very well we don’t have to spend a lot of time understanding the market or understanding the customer.”. And they made an early investment in Yahoo.“ “….a was starting.

Venture Capital 288

Venture Capital Startup Technical Review Software Review 288

Frank Addante

SEPTEMBER 25, 2006

▼ 2006 (20) ► December (2) Just Say What it Is 12 Proven Guidelines for Rapid Product Development. I guess this is how a world-class firm like Sequoia Capital finds and invests in world-class companies such as Google, Yahoo!, Rich Customers Target customers who will move fast and pay a premium for a unique offering.

Company 40

Company Companies Startup Venture Capital 40

Frank Addante

MAY 3, 2006

▼ 2006 (20) ► December (2) Just Say What it Is 12 Proven Guidelines for Rapid Product Development. It was an Internet search engine and directory "dot-com" (competitor to Yahoo!, we didnt even know Yahoo! At Starting Point, 100% of the interaction with our users/customers was via email. ► March (2) 4.

Startup 40

Startup Venture Capital Yahoo Email 40

Both Sides of the Table

DECEMBER 5, 2010

What I want to answer with this post (long though it may be) is: Why did Web 2.0 If you were a newly minted, venture-backed consumer Internet company you had to have a deal with AOL to reach your customers. Social Networking in Web 1.0: GeoCities, Tripod & Yahoo! Social Networking in Web 2.0:

Social Network 318

Social Network Networking Web 2.0 Startup 318